Will the US retaliate against Iran after a deadly drone attack?

JUST IN

A new line has been crossed. Iran-backed militias killed three US servicemembers in a drone attack on a base in northeastern Jordan. This is the first time US troops have been killed by enemy fire in the Middle East since the Hamas terrorist attacks of October 7 and Israel’s subsequent war in Gaza, which have led to escalating violence across the region. “We shall respond,” US President Joe Biden said Sunday. But how? Our experts explore what’s next.

TODAY’S EXPERT REACTION COURTESY OF

  • William F. Wechsler (@WillWechsler): Senior director of the Rafik Hariri Center and Middle East Programs at the Atlantic Council, and former US deputy assistant secretary of defense
  • Jonathan Panikoff (@jpanikoff): Director of the Scowcroft Middle East Security Initiative at the Atlantic Council’s Middle East Program and former US deputy national intelligence officer for the Near East
  • Qutaiba Idlbi (@Qidlbi): Nonresident senior fellow with the Atlantic Council’s Rafik Hariri Center and Middle East Programs, where he leads the Syria portfolio

A serious escalation

  • Up until now, says Will, US policymakers thought that “the threats from Iran and its proxies and partners were being successfully managed—especially the threats they posed to US forces in the region.” However, with today’s attacks, he says, this thinking has proved false.
  • According to Jonathan, the attack “reflects an increased risk tolerance” on Iran’s part in its bid for regional dominance. Syria- and Iraq-based Shia militants aligned with Iran, he adds, “would be unlikely to carry out such an attack without at least the implicit support and approval of senior Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) leaders.”
  • Unlike Iraq and Syria, Jonathan notes, Jordan “is not host to Iran-backed Shia militant bases,” meaning that “this was an attack on not only US forces but also on the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, a critical US ally.”
  • While the Islamic Resistance in Iraq “claimed the attack was a response to Israel’s war on Gaza,” says Qutaiba, “it is undeniably part of a larger escalation Iranian proxies have been leading against US positions in Syria and Iraq since late 2022.”

Subscribe to Fast Thinking email alerts

Sign up to receive rapid insight in your inbox from Atlantic Council experts on global events as they unfold.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

How to hit back

  • The United States “will have to respond forcibly to this attack,” says Will, but should ensure that its retaliation minimizes “the risk of provoking a wider regional war or forcing the Iraqi government to formally demand the withdrawal of US troops.”
  • To accomplish this, Will argues, the United States could pursue Iranian naval assets, target Houthi leadership, and “comprehensively enforce US sanctions against Iran.” Other options for retaliation include “targeting Iranian—not just proxy—personnel in Syria and eliminating individual IRGC leadership” while they’re traveling abroad, as in the US strike that killed senior IRGC leader Qasem Soleimani in 2020.
  • To establish deterrence, Qutaiba says,“the United States could deliver a strategic blow to Iran’s capabilities in Eastern Syria, upending the strategic Iraq-Syria-Lebanon land corridor.” Such an approach, he argues, “may prove beneficial to US positioning in the region, to regional allies, and to many of the region’s chronic conflicts in Syria and Lebanon.”
  • While US policy so far has been to avoid retaliation against Iran in a way that could spark a region-wide war, says Jonathan, the Biden administration must “decide whether hostilities have now crossed the Rubicon and the United States is already in a regional conflict.”

Further reading

Related Experts: William F. Wechsler, Jonathan Panikoff, and Qutaiba Idlbi

Image: Satellite view of the U.S. military outpost known as Tower 22, in Rukban, Rwaished District, Jordan October 12, 2023 in this handout image. Planet Labs PBC/Handout via REUTERS

Add a Comment